The global P&C side of the insurance industry has reported a significant boost in premiums, and the growing calls to insure climate-related risk are partly to blame. The resulting jump in insurance costs for policyholders is an issue that lawmakers are taking steps to address.
Lawmakers may need to take further actions as extreme weather events are expected to occur with greater intensity. The rise in insurance costs is a problem with knock-on effects across real estate, banking, and other industries.
Extreme weather events continue to increase in frequency and severity, reflecting changes in climate over the last two decades. As a result, the insurance industry has experienced a rise in catastrophe losses. In 2023, 28 weather and climate disasters with losses exceeding $1 billion each affected the US, with a combined total cost of $93 billion. Only one other year (2017) has had more billion-dollar disasters in the first six months (Figure 1).1
Insurers have reacted to the implications of severe weather events by lifting premiums (Figure 2). In the US, insurers have also reduced or eliminated the capacity they offer in states that are more significantly exposed to climate-related events and where pricing has not been adequate to cover expected claims. Consequently, home and business owners in some markets are no longer able to buy private insurance.
Meanwhile, on the public side, some state-owned insurance pools have moved from being providers of last resort to significant insurers.3 One state pool has become the tenth-largest insurer in the country.
Climate change has traditionally been considered to be a medium-to long-term risk from a supervisory perspective for insurers’ financial stability. Nonetheless, the increasing severity of weather events has brought the issue into more immediate focus for the regulators, insurance, and financial sector companies.
A surge in costs of insurance for policyholders, which can lead to certain markets becoming prohibitively expensive for building or inhabiting, could unleash a wide range of economic impacts. For example, builders must now pay special attention to whether their properties will be insurable in the future, and citizens must rethink whether to live in certain coastal communities.
Supervisors in both the US and Europe are conducting stress tests to assess the financial system’s resilience to potential physical and transitional risks from climate change. Regulators in Europe are exploring means of embedding climate risks into financial models, systems, processes, and policies.
Central banks’ financial stress models have moved from looking at typical business cycles to integrating climate-related risks over longer-term horizons.
The European Central Bank (ECB) has identified climate-related risks as a key driver in the SSM4 Risk Map for the euro area banking system. The ECB is of the view that institutions should take a strategic, forward-looking and comprehensive approach to considering climate-related and environmental risks.
The ECB climate stress test for financial institutions also assesses the impact of climate-related risks on the profitability and solvency of corporates. Mitigants and amplifiers of climate risks are also accounted for, as both could impact insurance coverage and premium costs (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Schematic Overview of Climate Risk Transmission to Firms Through Credit Risk
The Bank of England’s Climate Biennial Exploratory Scenario (CBES) in 2021 found that households and businesses that are likely to be impacted by physical climate-related risks could face insurance challenges and concluded:
The Federal Reserve conducted a Pilot Climate Scenario Analysis (CSA) exercise in 2023 to learn about large banking organizations’ climate risk-management practices and challenges. The objective was to enhance the ability of large banking organizations and supervisors to identify and estimate climate-related financial risk.5 Participants named: Bank of America Corporation; Citigroup Inc; The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.; JPMorgan Chase & Co.; Morgan Stanley; and Wells Fargo & Company.
In this exercise, “participants highlighted the important role that insurance plays in mitigating the risks of climate change for consumers, businesses, and banks. They noted the need to monitor changes across the insurance industry, including changes in insurance costs over time, and the impacts of those changes on consumers and businesses in specific markets and segments.”
A lack of comprehensive and consistent data related to “building characteristics, insurance coverage, and counterparties’” plans to manage climate-related risks was also highlighted.6 Participants’ probability of default estimates are in shown Figure 4.
Insurers face a difficult challenge to price their premiums appropriately for risk in order to remain solvent, to continue to offer competitive pricing, and also to avoid moral hazard from the customer side. Insurance premium pricing goes through cycles. However, upward pressure on pricing will persist in the longer-term if climate-related risks continue to build.
The sharp increase in insurance premiums can be a catalyst for:
The rising cost of insurance premiums due to climate-related risk therefore has the potential to pose a new type of systemic risk for the financial system. Regulators are clearly concerned and more data is needed for the extent of the risks to be properly assessed by the rest of the financial industry.
Future costs associated with climate-related risks will likely have a material impact on the insurance industry. For this and other reasons, such as regulatory changes, decarbonization efforts, and reputational concerns for companies, investors should look to incorporate climate-related risks into their longer-term investment outlook.